Legal Opinion
Nader v. Connor
District Court, W.D. Texas
Decided September 1, 2004No. 6:04-cv-00264PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
YEAKEL, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Ralph Nader, an independent candidate for office of president of the United States, and three individual Texas voters and supporters of Nader for president, 1 filed suit against Defendant Geoffrey S. Connor, Secretary of State for the State of Texas (the “Secretary of State”) seeking declaratory and injunctive relief pursuant to sections 1343, 2201, and 2202 of Title 28 of the United States Code 2 and the Civil Rights Act of 1871 3 to invalidate sections 192.032(a), 192.032(b)(3)(A), 192.032(c), and 192.032(d) of the Texas Election Code, 4…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama Ex Rel. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Anderson v. CelebrezzeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Williams v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Blankenship v. BlackwellOhio Supreme Court · 2004
- Nader v. CroninCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Nader v. ConnorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
- Nader for President 2004 v. Maryland State Board of ElectionsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- Faas v. CascosDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2016
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.