Legal Opinion
Treasurer of State of Connecticut v. Ballard Spahr Andrews & Ingersoll LLP
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided January 12, 2005PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
Judge SMITH-RIBNER.
The law firm Ballard Spahr Andrews & Ingersoll LLP (Ballard Spahr) appeals from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County that denied an unopposed motion for final approval of proposed settlement and unopposed motion seeking reimbursement of costs, expenses and fees. This matter involves a derivative action brought on behalf Of Keystone Venture V, L.P. (Keystone), a venture capital investment partnership, by five of Keystone’s thirty-seven limited partners. Those five named plaintiffs are the Treasurer of the State of Connecticut as Trustee for…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- City of Detroit v. Grinnell Corporation, Manhattan-Ward, Incorporated v. Grinnell Corporation, 1225 Vine Street Building, Inc. v. Grinnell CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Bell v. Beneficial Consumer Discount Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Kituskie v. CorbmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. BolgerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Shlensky v. DorseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- T.H. Properties, L.P. v. Upper Salford Township Board of SupervisorsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Treasurer of State of Connecticut v. Ballard Spahr Andrews & Ingersoll LLPCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005