Legal Opinion

Reedy Et Vir v. Pittsburgh

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 3, 1949No. Appeals, 169 and 170PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Linn,

The defendant, City of Pittsburgh, appeals from judgments on verdicts for husband and wife in their suit for damages for injury sustained by the wife in falling-on an icy sidewalk. The city’s principal contention is that the court erred in refusing its motions for judgments n. o. v.

While walking on the sidewalk in front of premises 1811 Rhine Street, about nine o’clock on the evening of November 16, 1940, during a “light” snow the wife plaintiff slipped * on ice concealed by the falling snow and sustained injury. The ice was caused by the freezing of water allowed…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Whitton v. H. A. Gable Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Brown v. WhiteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
  3. Holbert v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
  4. Beebe v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  5. Zieg Et Vir v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Casey v. SingerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  2. WECKSLER v. PhiladelphiaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  3. Claytor v. DurhamSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Hutchison v. MONTGOMERY WARD & CO.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  5. Scott v. Village of OliviaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API