Schwartz v. Taheny
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SEARS, Justice.
This is an appeal from a final judgment in favor of the plaintiff, Bernard Taheny. Schwartz, (Appellant), was Taheny’s prior attorney who intervened in Taheny’s personal injury suit. Appellant claims that a final judgment was entered which disposed of his intervention without a trial on the merits. We agree, and reverse and remand the case to district court for further proceedings.
Taheny was injured in a maritime accident in Louisiana. He hired Appellant to represent him on June 28, 1990. Trial was set for July 15, 1991. Taheny fired Appellant on June 1, 1991, and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Guaranty Federal Savings Bank v. Horseshoe Operating Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1990
- Christiansen v. PrezelskiTexas Supreme Court · 1990
- Schlipf v. Exxon Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1982
- Ray v. ChisumCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
3Cited by11 opinions
- In Re Union Carbide Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2008
- Welch v. Hrabar, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2003
- Serna v. Webster, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1995
- Bryant v. United Shortline Inc. Assurance Services, N.A.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1999
- Benson v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1995
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.