Legal Opinion

Smith v. Golden State Syndicate

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 23, 1919No. Civ. No. 3028PublishedCited by 8 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtLangdon, P. J.

This is an action to quiet title to certain real property in the city of Los Angeles. E. C. Laux, the respondent, filed a complaint in intervention, claiming to be the owner of a portion of the land described in plaintiff's complaint. The action was tried and judgment given upon the complaint in intervention of E. C. Laux and the answer thereto of J. H. Smith. The complaint in intervention was in form a suit to quiet title and alleged that the intervener was the owner in fee of the real property therein described. The answer was a denial of the title of the intervener. The court found that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Horton v. DominguezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Poledori v. NewmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Moore v. CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Real v. County of KernCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Childs v. GrossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  2. People v. WillisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  3. Scott v. WardenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  4. Gramson v. GeniellaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  5. McPhail v. NunesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API