Legal Opinion

State, by Burnquist v. Wm. O'Neil Sons Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 17, 1941No. 32,510PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Julius J. Olson, Justice.

The corporate defendant appeals from an order denying its motion for amended findings or a new trial.

The suit was brought under the declaratory judgments act for a construction of 1 Mason Minn. St. 1927, § 2554(17), “and the legal effect thereof,” as applied to a contract bearing date May 11, 1937, whereby defendant agreed to construct an interstate bridge and approaches thereto between the cities of Moorhead, Minnesota, and Fargo, North Dakota.

The court found that defendant proceeded with “the work to be performed under said contract,” and that it “was completed” on…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. University of Minnesota v. ChaseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  2. Ceco Steel Products Corp. v. TapagerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
  3. Westerson v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Minneapolis-St. Paul Sanitary District v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  2. Wm. Collins, Inc. v. South Dakota State Board of TransportationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API