Legal Opinion

Berlin v. Nathan

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 14, 1978No. 76-1465PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Romiti

This case involves another of the many retaliatory actions which physicians in Illinois and other States who have been sued for malpractice are filing against both the original plaintiff and the original attorney. In this case the original plaintiff’s husband was sued as well. In accord with the other cases in Illinois and elsewhere, we hold that the complaint, which failed to allege either malicious intent or special damages, failed to state a cause of action. We also hold that the court correctly dismissed the physician’s claim against the husband for barratry.

The pleadings reveal that on…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. ButtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Ohralik v. Ohio State Bar Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. United Mine Workers v. Illinois State Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. In Re PrimusSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Babb v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. Friedman v. DozorcMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Sanders v. Daniel International Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1984
  3. Beecy v. PucciarelliMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  4. Morowitz v. MarvelDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Galinski v. KesslerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API