Saliba v. Saliba

Candler, Justice.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) The only question now for decision is whether or not the court erred in appointing a receiver. Counsel by their briefs disagree as to whether the court heard evidence in support of the allegations of the petition. The bill of exceptions recites that the plaintiff in the court below introduced no evidence in support of his application. The order naming a receiver, which is a part of the record, recites: “The application for a receiver in the above *688matter coming on to be heard this the 20th day of July, 1946, after considering the…