Legal Opinion

Bury v. Sullivan

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 1, 1909PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorton, J.

This is a petition by the widow of one Daniel J. Sullivan pursuant to Pub. Sts. c. 124, § 3, as amended by St. 1894, c. 170, to have the whole of his real estate set out to her in fee. The husband died in May, 1896, leaving no issue, and, as the only persons interested in his estate, his widow, two brothers and a nephew. He left no personal property of any consequence, but was seised of one parcel of real estate worth at the time of his death and of the hearing in this court, if unincumbered, $8,500. At the time of his death it was subject to a mortgage of $4,100. The petitioner has been in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McCurdy v. McCurdyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  2. Sears v. SearsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
  3. Eastham v. BarrettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hite v. HiteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  2. Naylor v. NourseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
  3. Fellows v. NormandinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API