Legal Opinion

Fellows v. Normandin

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided July 6, 1950No. 3919PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDuncan, J.

Since the early decision of Bean v. Burleigh, 4 N. H. 550, it has consistently been held that the appellant in a probate appeal is limited to questions presented by his reasons of appeal. Scammon v. Pearson, 80 N. H. 122; Stevens v. Stevens, 71 N. H. 579, 580; Simmons v. Goodell, 63 N. H. 458; Patrick v. Cowles, 45 N. H. 553. “In all probate appeals, the superior court is the probate court of appeal. No other jurisdiction of the superior court may be attached to the appeal.” Applin v. Knowlton, 85 N. H. 320, 321. See also, Hood v. Marshall, 69 N. H. 605, 606. While these principles have not…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fox v. HillsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1815
  2. Turner v. BraggSupreme Court of Vermont · 1943
  3. Federal Finance Co. v. Forman Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
  4. Naylor v. NourseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
  5. Bury v. SullivanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fortino v. TimkoSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1970
  2. Stevens v. ThurstonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API