Legal Opinion
Sound Marine & Machine Corp. v. Westchester County
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 29, 1936PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HULBERT, District Judge.
The suit is in admiralty, which is sometimes assumed to possess all of the jurisdiction of a court of equity.
Karl M. Goldsmith owned a parcel of land, consisting of five lots on the south side of Mamaroneck Harbor, on the Rushmore Shore Front, Orienta Peninsula, town of Mamaroneck, Westchester county, N. Y., and the land under the waters of Indian creek -in front of and adjacent to said premises, upon which was erected a wharf and buildings wherein Goldsmith conducted the business of building, repairing, and storing yachts. Eventually, the business was incorporated…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Matthews v. RodgersSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Grace v. American Central InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Robertson v. CeaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Schoenamsgruber v. Hamburg American LineSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Metcalf v. WatertownSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Micromatic Hone Corp. v. Mid-West Abrasive Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1948
- Sound Marine & Machine Corp. v. Westchester CountyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1941