Legal Opinion

Hiligh v. Sands, Jr

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided June 10, 2019No. Civil Action No. 2018-2043Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA WILBUR HILIGH, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 18-cv-2043 (CRC) WILLIAM S. SANDS, JR., et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION In January 1997, Wilbur Hiligh was seriously injured while working at a Federal Express facility in Washington, D.C. He retained a law firm, Duncan and Hopkins, P.C., to represent him in seeking remedy. In 2000, the firm filed a civil suit on his behalf but dismissed it after realizing it had sued the wrong defendants. Nearly two decades later, Hiligh has sued the firm and several of its attorneys, alleging malpractice.…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Gustave-Schmidt v. ChaoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
  3. The Travelers Insurance Company v. 633 Third AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
  4. Sissel v. United States Department of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
  5. Veitch, D. Philip v. England, Gordon R.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API