Legal Opinion
Sissel v. United States Department of Health & Human Services
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided July 29, 2014No. 13-5202PublishedCited by 179 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge ROGERS.
ROGERS, Circuit Judge:
Section 5000A of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, 26 U.S.C. § 5000A, mandates that as of January 2014, non-exempt individuals maintain minimum health care coverage or, with limited exceptions, pay a penalty. Matt Sissel, who is an artist and small-business owner who serves from time to time on active duty with the National Guard, appeals the dismissal of his complaint alleging that the mandate violates the Commerce Clause, U.S. Const, art. I, § 8, cl. 8, and the Origination Clause, U.S. Const. art. I, §…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Marchetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Hollingsworth v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 2013
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by179 opinions
- Ahmad Nurriddin v. Charles BoldenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
- Townsend v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Congress v. Dist. of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- True the Vote, Inc. v. Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
- Proctor v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
174 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.