Legal Opinion · Dissent

In re Arbitration between Arthur Murray, Inc. & Ricciardi

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 9, 1961Published

1Dissent

Froessel, J. (dissenting).

We dissent and vote for modification.

Petitioner seeks to stay arbitration of a dispute allegedly arising out of nine identical franchise agreements. The clear, definite and appropriate language employed by the parties in these agreements and their failure to provide that consent might not be unreasonably withheld, as well as the special nature of the agreements, conferred upon petitioner the right to withhold its consent to their assignment (Allhusen v. Caristo Constr. Corp., 303 N. Y. 446; Sillman v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp., 3 N Y 2d 395; Boskowitz v. Cohn,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. In re Arbitration between Exercycle Corp. & MarattaNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
  2. Allhusen v. Caristo Construction Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1952
  3. Simon v. . EtgenNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  4. In re the Arbitration between General Electric Co. & United Electrical Radio & Machine Workers of America, C.I.O.New York Court of Appeals · 1949
  5. Nassau Hotel Co. v. Barnett & Barse Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API