Legal Opinion

Smith v. Casey

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided October 15, 1979No. 79SA248PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Erickson

In this original proceeding, the petitioner, Christina Tara Smith, requests that this Court issue a writ of prohibition directing the respondent district court to not proceed further in the determination of the paternity of petitioner’s minor child. She also asks this Court to prohibit the respondent court from enforcing an order that petitioner and the minor child submit to blood tests to produce evidence relating to paternity of the child. We issued a rule to show cause, and for the reasons set forth in this opinion, now make that rule absolute.

The petitioner’s husband, Douglas Edward…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Viernes v. DISTRICT COURT IN & FOR FOURTH JUD. DIST.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1973

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People in Interest of RTLSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
  2. In Re the Marriage of BurkeyColorado Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. In Re the Marriage of De La CruzColorado Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. In re E.K.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. People in Interest of RTLSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API