Legal Opinion
Viernes v. DISTRICT COURT IN & FOR FOURTH JUD. DIST.
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided April 23, 1973No. 25670PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Erickson
Pursuant to C.A.R. 21, an original proceeding was filed to prohibit the district court from proceeding further in an action for dissolution of marriage. The district court held that it had jurisdiction to proceed after the plaintiff-husband established that he was a member of the armed services who was stationed in Colorado for more than ninety days before the suit for dissolution of marriage was filed. We issued a rule to show cause and now make the rule absolute.
Our decision is premised on an interpretation of the Uniform Dissolution of Marriage Act, 1971 Perm. Supp., C.R.S. 1963, 46-1-1.…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Williams v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Williams v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- May v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re the Marriage of BurkeyColorado Court of Appeals · 1984
- Robert David Knapp v. Randy Henderson Attorney General of the State of Colorado Colorado State Parole BoardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Harrod v. HarrodColorado Court of Appeals · 1974
- Smith v. CaseySupreme Court of Colorado · 1979
- In re the Marriage of PetersColorado Court of Appeals · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.