Legal Opinion
In Re the Marriage of De La Cruz
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided April 19, 1990No. 89CA0121PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge DUBOFSKY.
The issues in this appeal are whether the trial court has jurisdiction to determine non-paternity in an action brought under the Revised Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act (RURESA), consolidated with a dissolution of marriage action; and if so, whether its order is valid when the court failed to follow the procedures outlined in the Uniform Parentage Act (U.P.A.), § 19-4-101, et seq., C.R.S. (1989 Cum.Supp.). We determine that although jurisdiction lies in the district court, the order entered here is void for failure to follow the procedures of the U.P.A.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People in Interest of RTLSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
- City & County of Denver v. District Court of the Second Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
- Redin v. Empire Oldsmobile, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1987
- In Re the Marriage of BurkeyColorado Court of Appeals · 1984
- Hamman v. County Court in & for the County of JeffersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re the Parental Responsibilities Concerning G.E.R.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2011
- People ex rel. J.G.C.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2013
- People ex rel. County of Sonoma ex rel. J.S. v. HolleronColorado Court of Appeals · 1990
- In Re GerColorado Court of Appeals · 2011