Legal Opinion
Agranoff v. Miller
Court of Chancery of Delaware
Decided November 8, 2001No. Civ.A. 16795PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STRINE, Vice Chancellor.
This opinion addresses the remand order of the Supreme Court that required this court to determine the price at which certain warrants held by Banker’s Trust (the ‘Warrants” or Warrant Shares”) could have been purchased by either plaintiff Citicorp Venture Capital, Ltd. (“CVC”) or EMS Corp. (“EMS”) in 1998. The Warrants were purchased in autumn 1998 by defendant Edward M. Miller as part of Miller’s conspiracy with EMS director and president John Ovens, Jr. to acquire control of EMS through a variety of inequitable and deceptive tactics. These tactics included…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Guth v. Loft, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1939
- Cavalier Oil Corp. v. HarnettSupreme Court of Delaware · 1989
- Thorpe by Castleman v. Cerbco, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1996
- Bomarko, Inc. v. International Telecharge, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1999
- Rapid-American Corp. v. HarrisSupreme Court of Delaware · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- In re Trados Inc. Shareholder LitigationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2013
- In re Southern Peru Copper Corp. Shareholder Derivative LitigationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2011
- Union Illinois 1995 Investment Ltd. Partnership v. Union Financial Group, Ltd.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2004
- Highfields Capital, Ltd. v. AXA Financial, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2007
- Northwest Investment Corp. v. WallaceSupreme Court of Iowa · 2007
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.