Northwest Investment Corp. v. Wallace
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
STREIT, Justice.
“This is a story about control.” 1 Minority shareholders who were required to re deem their shares after a reverse stock split refused to accept the corporation’s offer to buy back their shares. They complained the offer did not include the additional amount a buyer would theoretically pay to own a controlling interest in the corporation. The district court held the proper valuation of the minority shareholders’ stock included a control premium. On appeal, we must determine (1) whether Iowa’s statute requiring a corporation in a reverse stock split to pay the shareholders…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Cavalier Oil Corp. v. HarnettSupreme Court of Delaware · 1989
- In Re Valuation of Common Stock of McLoon Oil Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1989
- Rapid-American Corp. v. HarrisSupreme Court of Delaware · 1992
- Union Illinois 1995 Investment Ltd. Partnership v. Union Financial Group, Ltd.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2004
- Hansen v. 75 Ranch Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1998
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- U.S. Bank N. A. v. Cold Spring Granite Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- John R. Baur v. Baur Farms, Inc. and Robert F. BaurSupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
- Susan A. Guge and Peggy McDonald v. Kassel Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2021
- Twc I, L.L.c, F/K/A the Weitz Company I, Inc. and Twc II, L.L.C., F/K/A the Weitz Company II, Inc., plaintiffs/counterclaim-defendants/appellees/cross-appellants v. Craig Damos, defendant/counterclaim-plaintiff/appellant/cross-appellee.Court of Appeals of Iowa · 2015