Grimsley v. State

Fenton, Justice.

The accused was indicted, tried and convicted of robbery with an offensive weapon based upon the direct testimony of an accomplice, who was identified as the actual holder of the weapon, that this accused was the “lookout man.”

1. There was ample evidence other than that of the accomplice, some of which was circumstantial in nature, that the accused was seen before and after the crime in the company of the persons who were identified positively as those performing the robbery; that there was a “lookout” who remained at the door of the supermarket during the robbery who was…