Thomas v. Shear
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
Linda Thomas v. David Shear No. 2669, Sept. Term, 2018 Opinion by Leahy, J. Motion for Summary Judgment > Contradictory Affidavit or Statement The trial court correctly determined that affidavits of the plaintiff’s experts were materially inconsistent with the prior deposition testimony of the experts and should be disregarded pursuant to Maryland Rule 2-501(e). The affidavits, in which the experts opined that kidney stones, and not the surgical clip, caused Ms. Thomas’s hydronephrosis in 2006 is explicitly opposite to their sworn deposition testimony that the surgical clip caused Ms.…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Poffenberger v. RisserCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
- Ashton v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
- Hahn v. ClaybrookCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1917
- Newell v. RichardsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
- Oxtoby v. McGowanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Brunenkant v. Suburban Hospital, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2023
- In the Matter of Winifred CarpenterCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2024
- Mayor & City Cncl. of Ocean City v. Washington PostCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2026
- Simmons v. Trent, MDDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2024