Legal Opinion
1230-1250 Twenty-Third Street Condominium Unit Owners Ass'n v. Bolandz
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided August 27, 2009No. 06-CV-838PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RUIZ, Associate Judge:
Appellant, 1230-1250 Twenty Third Street Condominium Unit Owners Association, Inc. (“condominium association” or “association”), appeals the trial court’s award of attorney’s fees to appellee, Richard A. Bolandz. We disagree with the association’s argument that the trial court erroneously interpreted a provision in the condominium bylaws allowing for attorney’s fees, and that the amount awarded was unreasonable. We therefore affirm the grant of attorney’s fees to Mr. Bo-landz.
I
We briefly summarize the relevant facts and procedural history here, as they have already been…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Holland v. HannanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
- National Ass'n of Postmasters of the United States v. Hyatt Regency WashingtonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
- District of Columbia v. HuntDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Washington Automotive Co. v. 1828 L Street AssociatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
- Maybin v. StewartDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Dyer v. BilaalDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- Millennium Square Residential Association v. 2200 M Street LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Spanish Court Two Condominium Ass'n v. CarlsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2012
- Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. v. HagenbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017
- Kamal Jahanbein v. The Ndidi Condominium Unit Owners Association, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.