Legal Opinion

Shepherd v. Derwinski

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 1, 1992No. Nos. 90-15911, 90-16670PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In this appeal, we decide whether the Arizona anti-deficiency law is preempted by Department of Veteran Affairs (VA) regulations that authorize the VA to collect deficiencies on VA-guaranteed home loans. Ariz.Rev.Stat.Ann. §§ 33-729 A, 33-814 G. Because the Arizona anti-deficiency law at issue here is identical to the Oregon anti-deficiency law we considered in Connelly v. Derwinski, 961 F.2d 129, 130 (9th Cir.1992), we hold, on the basis of that opinion, that Arizona’s anti-deficiency law is preempted by 38 C.F.R. § 36.4323(e). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s summary judgment…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Connelly v. DerwinskiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. RezzonicoDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1998
  2. Carter v. DerwinskiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  3. Carter v. DerwinskiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  4. Ronald Shepherd, on Behalf of and All in the State of Arizona Similarly Situated Rollin Barkley, on Behalf of and All in the State of Arizona Similarly Situated Robert A. Bricker Marion Rodgers v. Edward J. Derwinski, Administrator of the Veterans' Administration, United States of America v. Rollin Barkley Ronald Shepherd Robert A. Bricker Marion RodgersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API