Legal Opinion
Russ Togs, Inc. v. Grinnell Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 2, 1969No. 67 Civ. 2594PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
METZNER, District Judge.
Defendants in these private antitrust actions move for partial summary judgment with respect to any claims which may have accrued more than four years prior to the filing of the respective complaints on the ground that such claims are barred by the applicable statute of limitations. § 4B of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 15b, provides:
“Any action to enforce any cause of action under sections 15 or 15a of this title shall be forever barred unless commenced within four years after the cause of action accrued.”
The plaintiffs resist the motion, relying on § 5(b) of the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. New Jersey Wood Finishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Union Carbide & Carbon Corp. v. NisleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1961
- Leh v. General Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Sun Theatre Corp. v. RKO Radio Pictures, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1954
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- City of Detroit v. Grinnell Corporation, Manhattan-Ward, Incorporated v. Grinnell Corporation, 1225 Vine Street Building, Inc. v. Grinnell CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- City of Detroit v. Grinnell Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- City of Detroit v. Grinnell CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1972
- City Of Detroit v. Grinnell CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977