Lee v. Shull
Indiana Supreme Court
Prom Blackford Circuit Court; Charles E. Sturgis, Judge. Application by John W. Lee for license to retail intoxicating’ liquors, against which C. Q. Shull and others remonstrate. Prom a judgment for remonstrants, the applicant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtHadley, J.
On May 29, 1908, three days before the regular June session of the Board of Commissioners of the County of Wells, a general remonstrance against the granting to any one of a license to sell intoxicating liquors at retail, within the second ward of the city of Montpelier, was filed with the auditor of said county, which remonstrance, when filed, contained the names of 131 persons. Appellant had previously given notice that he would, at the June ses*311sion of said board, apply for a license to retail liquors in said ward. At the last preceding election there were 213 legal votes cast in the ward,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. GerhardtIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
- Castle v. BellIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
- Cain v. AllenIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
- Ludwig v. CoryIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
- Sutherland v. McKinneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Behler v. AckleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
- Wartell v. Peters Hotel Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1919
- Parker v. Seward School TownshipIndiana Supreme Court · 1959
- Scanlon v. DeuelIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
- Adams v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.