Legal Opinion

Ludwig v. Cory

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 23, 1902No. 19,615PublishedCited by 25 opinions

From Hancock Circuit Court; E. W. Felt, Judge. From a judgment affirming an order of the hoard of. county commissioners refusing the application of John M. Ludwig for a license to sell intoxicating liquors, the applicant appeals. Transferred to Supreme Court, under §1337u Burns 1901.

1Opinion of the CourtJordan, C. J.

Appellant, John M. Ludwig, applied to the board of commissioners of Marion county, under §7278 Burns 1901, §5314 Horner 1901, for a license to sell intoxicating liquors at the village of Oaklandon, in Lawrence township, Marion county, Indiana. Written remonstrances, based on §7283i Burns 1901, purporting to have been signed by a majority of the legal voters of Lawrence township, were filed with the auditor of said county. By virtue of these remonstrances *583the board denied appellant’s application, and adjudged that he pay the costs of the proceeding. From this decision of the board he appealed…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. GerhardtIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Castle v. BellIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Massey v. DunlapIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Sutherland v. McKinneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Cochell v. ReynoldsIndiana Supreme Court · 1900

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Cain v. AllenIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Smith v. WalcottNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Atkinson v. DisherIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Behler v. AckleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Liese v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1954

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API