Legal Opinion
Mills v. Amoco Performance Products, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Georgia
Decided December 23, 1994No. Civ. A. CV192-258PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
BOWEN, District Judge.
For the reasons stated below, Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART; Plaintiffs’ Motion to Strike Unsworn Statements and Motion to Strike Affidavit of John Penny or in the Alternative to Take Further Deposition Testimony are DENIED.
I. BACKGROUND
The Plaintiffs, Jackie Mills and David Hill, contend that Defendant Amoco Performance Products, Inc. (Amoco) violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2ÜOOe, et seq. Allegedly, Mills was sexually harassed as Amoco’s employee and, after she filed a…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Vincent DeNOVELLIS, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
- Hudson v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2001
- Hernandez v. WangenDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1996
- Marshall v. OK Rental & Leasing, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
- Fowler v. Sunrise Carpet Industries, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1996
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.