Legal Opinion

Branford State Bank v. Howell Co.

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided December 18, 1924PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Per curiam

Both parties hereto are Florida corporations. Branford State Bank sued the Howell Company to recover the amount of three notes specifically set out in the declaration, which also included the common counts. The case went to trial on the general issue and denial of the notes and execution thereof on the part of the defendant.

At the conclusion of all the testitmony a motion for directed verdict on the part of defendant was granted. This court has frequently held that the judge should never direct a verdict for one party unless the evidence is such that no view which the jury may lawfully take…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. German American Lumber Co. v. BrockSupreme Court of Florida · 1908
  2. Florida East Coast Railway Co. v. HayesSupreme Court of Florida · 1914
  3. Johnson ex rel. Johnson v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of Florida · 1910
  4. Thompson v. Laboringman's Mercantile & Manufacturing Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1906

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Cameron & Barkley Co. v. Law-Engle Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1929
  2. Tampa Shipbuilding & Engineering Corp. v. AdamsSupreme Court of Florida · 1938
  3. Michael Costello v. Barry LipsitzCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  4. Love v. Brown Development Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1930
  5. Meyer v. Nator Holding Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1931

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API