Legal Opinion

State v. Christner

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 17, 1997No. S-96-200PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Per curiam

Kelly R. Christner claims that due to the test result from an improperly obtained sample of his blood, a Red Willow county judge convicted him of operating or being in the actual physical control of a motor vehicle while he had an excessive concentration of alcohol in his body.

Upon Christner’s appeal to the district court for Red Willow County, that court affirmed Christner’s county court conviction. *551Christner then appealed to the Nebraska Court of Appeals. We transferred the matter to this court’s docket pursuant to our authority to regulate the dockets of the two appellate courts.

We reverse…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. PalmerNebraska Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Smith v. State, Dept. of Motor VehiclesNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. LeeNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
  4. State v. LomackNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
  5. State v. HingstNebraska Supreme Court · 1997

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State v. AndersonNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. BlackmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State v. HingstNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State v. EmrichNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State v. RouckaNebraska Supreme Court · 1998

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API