Legal Opinion
State v. Blackman
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided July 2, 1998No. S-97-105PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtStephan, J.
The Nebraska Court of Appeals concluded that William C. Blackman’s conviction for driving under the influence of alcohol (DUI), in violation of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 60-6,196 (Reissue 1993), should be reversed, based upon its determination that the evidence adduced at his trial was insufficient to sustain the conviction. State v. Blackman, 6 Neb. App. 294, 572 N.W.2d 101 (1997). We granted the State’s petition for further review and conclude that the evidence, while mostly circumstantial, was sufficient to sustain the conviction.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
In a complaint filed on June 5,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- State v. PierceNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. ThompsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
- Coleman v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1986
- State v. KubikNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. KulaNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Kuciemba v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2010
- State v. BaueNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. GarciaNebraska Supreme Court · 2023
- State v. StubbendieckNebraska Supreme Court · 2019
- Scillitani v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2011
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.