Long-Bell Lbr. Co. v. NAT. BK. OF COMMERCE OF SEATTLE
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMallery, J.
This is an appeal from a declaratory judgment interpreting a contract.
The plaintiff-appellants are; (1) The Long-Bell Lumber Company, hereinafter called Long-Bell, and (2) Messrs. *524Morris and Goodrich, its officers, who represent Long-Bell in real-estate transactions under this contract and whom we shall call the reconstituted diking district committee or RDDCom. The defendant-cross-appellants are: (1) the protective committee for certain local improvement. district bondholders, hereinafter called the LIDCom, and (2) Mr. Warrens, the managerial agent of the two committees in the real-estate…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Carnation Lumber & Shingle Co. v. Tolt Land Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1918
3Cited by13 opinions
- Mall Tool Co. v. Far West Equipment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1954
- Boeing Airplane Co. v. Firemen's Fund Indemnity Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1954
- Cities Service Oil Co. v. Geolograph Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
- Flynn v. Dick Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Bank of Silvis v. Boultinghouse Auction Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1979
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.