Legal Opinion

Long-Bell Lbr. Co. v. NAT. BK. OF COMMERCE OF SEATTLE

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 26, 1950No. 30966PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMallery, J.

This is an appeal from a declaratory judgment interpreting a contract.

The plaintiff-appellants are; (1) The Long-Bell Lumber Company, hereinafter called Long-Bell, and (2) Messrs. *524Morris and Goodrich, its officers, who represent Long-Bell in real-estate transactions under this contract and whom we shall call the reconstituted diking district committee or RDDCom. The defendant-cross-appellants are: (1) the protective committee for certain local improvement. district bondholders, hereinafter called the LIDCom, and (2) Mr. Warrens, the managerial agent of the two committees in the real-estate…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Carnation Lumber & Shingle Co. v. Tolt Land Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1918

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Mall Tool Co. v. Far West Equipment Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Boeing Airplane Co. v. Firemen's Fund Indemnity Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Cities Service Oil Co. v. Geolograph Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
  4. Flynn v. Dick Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2005
  5. Bank of Silvis v. Boultinghouse Auction Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1979

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API