Legal Opinion

George A. Fuller Co. v. Vitro Corp. of America

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 3, 1966PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order entered September 21, 1966, unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, and the motion to vacate the attachment is denied and the attachment is reinstated, with $30 costs and disbursements to abide the event. The defendant moved for an order pursuant to CPLR 6223 to vacate a warrant of attachment and levies made thereunder. In the circumstances the attachment could only be vacated if it should be found that it is unnecessary to the security of the plaintiff”. We agree with the Appellate Term’s conclusion in Zeiberg v. Robosonics, Inc. (43 Misc 2d 134) that the burden of proof is on…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Zeiberg v. Robosonics, Inc.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1964

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Sugar v. Curtis Circulation CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1974
  2. American Jerex Co. v. Universal Aluminum Extrusions, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1972
  3. Marklin v. Drew Properties Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1967
  4. B. B. Weit Printing Co. v. Frances Denney, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1969
  5. Regnell v. PageNew York Supreme Court · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API