Legal Opinion

Zeiberg v. Robosonics, Inc.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided May 7, 1964PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

The attack upon the order of attachment was grounded upon the fact that the defendant foreign corporation is authorized to do business in this State and has its principal office in this city. In the circumstances, it was contended, and the court below so ruled in vacating the warrant, that an attachment was unnecessary for the purpose of acquiring jurisdiction. The provisional remedy, however, is not intended as solely a method of acquiring jurisdiction. It also performs the role of providing security for a plaintiff. In the present instance the defendant failed to show that the attachment…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Prentiss v. GreeneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Itc Entertainment, Limited v. Nelson Film Partners and Frank MenkeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
  2. Nippon Emo-Trans Co., Ltd. v. Emo-Trans, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1990
  3. A. C. Israel Commodity Co. v. Banco Do Brasil, S. A.New York Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Marklin v. Drew Properties Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1967
  5. George A. Fuller Co. v. Vitro Corp. of AmericaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API