Hi-Tech Furnace Systems, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge GARLAND.
GARLAND, Circuit Judge:
Hi-Tech Furnace Systems, Inc. and its president, Robert E. Kornfeld, 1 filed a complaint with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) concerning revisions Sprint Communications made in a long distance calling program known as “Fridays Free.” Concluding that the revisions were lawful, the FCC denied the complaint. We affirm.
I
Sprint, a common carrier regulated under the Communications Act of 1934, provides long distance telephone service to the public. See 47 U.S.C. §§ 153(h), 203. Hi-Tech is a small business…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Heckler v. ChaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Netcoalition v. Securities & Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013
- Ting v. AT & TDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2002
- Policy & Research, LLC v. U.S. Dep't of Health & Human Servs.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Archuleta v. Santa Fe Police Department Ex Rel. City of Santa FeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2005
- Global Crossing Telecommunications, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.