Legal Opinion

People v. Hales

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 29, 1966No. Crim. No. 5403PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSims, J.

The People have appealed from orders of the trial court which (1) purported to vacate and set aside a prior judgment which sentenced the defendant to prison following his conviction by jury verdict of burglary in the second degree in violation of section 459 of the Penal Code and (2) thereupon granted his motion for new trial.

The People contend that the trial court had no power or authority to vacate the judgment, and that defendant’s motion for a new trial was not timely made and should not have been granted by the trial court. The trial court does have power and authority to vacate its…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. People v. IbarraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  2. People v. ShipmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  3. People v. ReevesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  4. People v. RobargeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  5. People v. TuthillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. PinedaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  2. People v. HalesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  3. People v. SnyderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  4. In Re ScogginsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  5. People v. SainzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API