Morgan v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SHEPARD, Chief Justice.
Lisa Morgan has appealed her sentence for dealing methamphetamine on a variety of grounds, including an adequately preserved claim under Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 408 (2004). Her appeal produces three conclusions about post-Blakely sentencing under our then existing code: 1) aggrava-tors that may be found by a judge alone must still be weighed to determine whether they warrant sentence enhancement; 2) sentence enhancements may rest upon facts acknowledged by the defendant; and 3) observations a court makes about such factors may…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- State v. HughesWashington Supreme Court · 2005
- Smylie v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Trusley v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
- Scott v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
- Jose Guzman v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
- Mask v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
- Rolando Miguel-Gaspar Mateo v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.