Legal Opinion

Scott v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 13, 2006No. 71A03-0505-CR-240PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FRIEDLANDER, Judge.

With permission to bring a belated appeal, Travis Michael Seott appeals his forty-year sentence imposed after his guilty plea to class A felony robbery. Scott raises one issue for review. As restated, the issue is: Did the trial court err in sentencing Seott by relying upon an improper aggravating factor and by failing to find that Seott's guilty plea and his mental illness constituted mitigating factors? 1

We affirm.

The facts reveal that on December 7, 2002, Seott approached Bruce Carter outside of a bar in Mishawaka, Indiana. Seott pointed a gun at Carter and told…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Ritchie v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Cotto v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Widener v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Fointno v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1986

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Hurst v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. Creekmore v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. Washington v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. Primmer v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. Rawson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API