Legal Opinion

Aldrich v. Springfield, Athol & North Eastern Railroad

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 2, 1878PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGray, C. J.

This is an action of tort by the administratrix of Nelson Aldrich, to recover for injuries sustained by him, while employed as a brakeman upon a passenger train on the defendant’s railroad, by reason of the alleged negligence of the defendant in running that train by a flying switch over a side track, and in leaving a freight train on that track.

At the trial in the Superior Court, certain rules of the defendant’s superintendent were introduced in evidence, by one of which “ all passenger trains must come to a full stop at all stations before detaching any part of the train.” No exception was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Whittaker v. Inhabitants of West BoylstonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867
  2. McAllister v. BurrillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Peterson v. HopsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  2. Daddario v. City of GloucesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1952
  3. Constance Scaccia v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  4. Dearborn v. MathesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880
  5. Smith v. LincolnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API