Legal Opinion

Van Cise, Phillips and Goldberg v. Jelen

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 30, 1979No. 27961PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Hodges

The plaintiff, the law firm of Van Cise, Phillips, and Goldberg, brought an action on a promissory note against defendants, Michael Jelen, individually, and Jelen and Son, Inc., a corporation of which Michael Jelen was president. The trial court entered judgment in favor of the plaintiff for the full amount of the promissory note plus interest and attorney’s fees. The defendants appealed. We affirm the trial court’s judgment.

In early 1968, the defendants retained attorney Hugh McClearn to perform various legal services. Shortly thereafter, this attorney joined the plaintiff law firm.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. MedinaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1974
  2. Enyart v. OrrSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925
  3. Bryant v. HandSupreme Court of Colorado · 1965
  4. Rupp v. CoolSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961
  5. People v. DilgerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1978

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. MalacaraSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980
  2. Hurricane v. Kanover, Ltd.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1982
  3. Mikkleson v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980
  4. People v. TurturaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  5. Tucker v. EllbogenColorado Court of Appeals · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API