Legal Opinion

Polaco v. Prudencio

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided June 25, 2010No. 29,599PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FRY, Chief Judge.

{1} This appeal requires us to determine whether the suit brought by Plaintiff Ramona Salcido Polaco against Defendant Cornelia Salcido Prudencio to resolve a boundary dispute between them was barred by any statute of limitations. Polaco filed suit in 1998, approximately ten years after she first discovered that there was a dispute over the boundary line between her property and Prudencio’s, but only two years after Prudencio completed construction of a fence along that disputed boundary line. The district court concluded that due to the ongoing nature of the conflict…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Garcia v. Garcia Ex Rel. Estate of GarciaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
  2. New Mexico Products Co. v. New Mexico Power Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Lopez v. AdamsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Murray Hotel Co. v. GoldingNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Turner Ex Rel. Manzano Resources v. BassettNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2005

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kaywal, Inc. v. Avangrid Renewables, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API