Legal Opinion

Cendant Corp. v. Forbes

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided October 8, 1999No. 99 CIV. 4869(JSR)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

RAKOFF, District Judge.

This Opinion And Order confirms the Court’s bench ruling of September 13, 1999, which denied respondent’s motion seeking to dismiss or stay this action pending arbitration.

The pertinent allegations, essentially undisputed, are as follows. On July 28, 1998, the Board of Directors of petitioner Cen-dant Corporation held a special meeting in New York to consider terminating the employment of respondent Walter A. Forbes, who had served as Chairman of the Board since the corporation’s inception but was now involved in inquiries concerning certain alleged…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Katz v. FeinbergDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
  2. Life Rehab Services, Inc. v. Allied Property & Casualty InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2007
  3. Luxottica Group, S.P.A. v. Bausch & Lomb Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API