Legal Opinion

United States v. Raul Fernandez-Alfonso

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 9, 1987No. 86-1331PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant Raul Fernandez-Alfonso appeals from the district court’s pretrial detention order entered under the Bail Reform Act of 1984 (Act), 18 U.S.C. § 3142. Fernandez-Alfonso contends that the thirty day delay between his motion for review of the magistrate’s detention order and the district court hearing violated the requirement under section 3145(b) that the district court determine the motion “promptly.” On the facts of this case, we agree that thirty days was not prompt. For the reasons set forth below, we reverse the district court’s order and remand to the district court to impose…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. Antonio Jose Hurtado, Mark Anthony Olson, Diego Alonzo Flores-Soto, Hector Albert Rua and Jose Pita AndradeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
  2. United States v. Melendez-CarrionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
  3. United States v. Donald PaydenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
  4. United States v. Alan Herbert Abrahams, A/K/A James A. CarrCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978
  5. United States v. Riad Abed Al-AzzawyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. Eligio Palmer-Contreras and Jose A. Casanova OrtizCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
  2. United States v. GottiDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1991
  3. United States v. Gonzolo GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  4. United States v. Tommy Ward BarkerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
  5. United States v. HuckabayDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API