Legal Opinion

Borella v. Borden Co.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided January 2, 1945No. 398PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

L. HAND, Circuit Judge.

This appeal is from a judgment, dismissing the complaint in an action brought by employees of the defendant to recover for overtime denied them, which they assert to have been due under § 7(a) of the Fair Labor Standards Act, § 207(a), Title 29 U.S.C.A. The facts, which are not in dispute, are sufficiently stated in the findings of the trial judge. The upshot of them is as follows. The defendant is a New Jersey corporation engaged in the milk business, which includes “processing, manufacturing, selling and distributing” milk as such, and making condensed and evaporated…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. A. B. Kirschbaum Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. McLeod v. ThrelkeldSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Stoike v. First National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
  4. Atlantic Co. v. WallingCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1942
  5. Rucker v. First Nat. Bank of Miami, Okl.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1943

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Utility Air Regulatory Group v. EPASupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  2. International Business MacHines Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
  3. Borden Co. v. BorellaSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. In Re Grand Jury Subpoena of Alphonse PersicoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
  5. Warkentin v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API