Legal Opinion

Norton v. Hall

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided September 30, 2003PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Majority: SAUFLEY, C.J., and CLIFFORD, RUDMAN, and LEVY, JJ.

Concurrence: SAUFLEY, C.J.

Dissent: DANA, ALEXANDER, and CALKINS, JJ.

*930CLIFFORD, J.

[¶ 1] Michelle Norton and John Norton appeal from the summary judgment entered in the Superior Court (Cumberland County, Humphrey, J.) in favor of defendants Deborah Hall, the Cumberland County Sheriff’s Department, and Cumberland County. The court concluded that the Nortons’ suit is barred by the discretionary function immunity provisions of the Maine Tort Claims Act, 14 M.R.S.A. §§ 8101-8118 (2003) and that their constitutional claims are precluded…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. County of Sacramento v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Carroll v. City of PortlandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
  4. Roberts v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
  5. Selby v. Cumberland CountySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Perez v. Unified Government of Wyandotte County/Kansas CityCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  2. Ramos v. FlowersNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2012
  3. Morgan v. KooistraSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008
  4. Rodriguez v. Town of Moose RiverSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2007
  5. Tolliver v. Department of TransportationSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API