Clark v. Clark
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtSkoghmd, J.
Father appeals from an order of the Chittenden Family Court granting mother’s motion to modify child support. He argues that the court had no jurisdiction to modify the award because mother failed to meet her burden of showing a real, substantial and unanticipated change of circumstances, see 15 V.S.A. § 660(a) & (b); and, even if the court had jurisdiction, it incorrectly determined the amount of the modified award. We affirm.
The following facts are not in dispute. Mother and father were married in 1980. Their son Justin was bom in 1982 and their daughter Mattie was bom in 1986. Justin…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Kay v. KayNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Tarrant v. Department of TaxesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
- State v. O'NEILLSupreme Court of Vermont · 1996
- Miller v. MillerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
- State v. ReadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1996
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Gangwish v. GangwishNebraska Supreme Court · 2004
- Coyle v. CoyleSupreme Court of Vermont · 2007
- Nace v. NaceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- Patnode v. UretteSupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
- Patnode v. UretteSupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.