Legal Opinion

Nace v. Nace

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 30, 2008No. 24618PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEIERHENRY, Justice.

[¶ 1.] Daniel Nace appeals a circuit court’s acceptance of a referee’s child support recommendation.

FACTS

[¶ 2.] April and Daniel Nace divorced in January 2006. Daniel, the noncustodial parent of the parties’ two minor children, was ordered to pay April $574 per month in child support. April later petitioned to modify child support alleging a change in her employment and an increase in daycare costs. April also requested deviations, pursuant to SDCL 25-7-10(2) and (6), for the “financial condition of either party” and the “voluntary act reducing either parent’s income.”

[¶…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Taylor v. FezellTennessee Supreme Court · 2005
  2. West v. WestMississippi Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Ochs v. NelsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Roberts v. RobertsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Clark v. ClarkSupreme Court of Vermont · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Halbersma v. HALBERSMASouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Dunham v. SabersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
  3. Crawford v. SchulteSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Halbersma v. HALBERSMASouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Nace v. NaceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API