Legal Opinion

Allen v. Raleigh-Wyoming Mining Co.

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1936No. 8356PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Litz, Judge:

This is an action under section'2, article 4, chapter 23, Code 1931, providing that an employee sustaining injury “from the deliberate intention of his employer to produce such injury,” shall be entitled to compensation under the statute, and damages from the employer to the extent of his injury in excess of the amount received or receivable under the Compensation Act.

Plaintiff, Anthony Ross Allen, was injured in the course and as the result of his employment, as servant of defendant, Raleigh-Wyoming Mining Company, on the night of June 7, 1934, while riding the front end of a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Jenkins v. Carman Mfc. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Jacobs v. HoittWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Perry v. BeverageWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Nimick & Co. v. Mingo Iron Works Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Collins v. Dravo Contracting Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1933

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Mandolidis v. Elkins Industries, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Breimhorst v. BeckmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  3. Brewer v. Appalachian Constructors, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Cline v. Joy Mfg. Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Bell v. Vecellio & Grogan, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1996

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API