Hecock v. Van Dusen
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Monroe. (Kinne, J.) Trespass. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion, and in the former report of the case.
1Opinion of the CourtMcGrath, J.
This is an action of trespass, and is before us for the second time. 80 Mich. 359.
The case was tried without a jury, and error is assigned upon the findings.
The first, second, and fourth assignments are disposed of by the former opinion.
The sixth assignment of error, viz., “that the court erred in rendering judgment for the defendants,” does not conform to the requirements of Supreme Court Rule No. 12, and will not be considered.
There was evidence tending to show that defendants had, prior to the commencement of this suit, entered upon the land, and cleared off a portion thereof, and the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Stockle v. SilsbeeMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
- Hecock v. Van DusenMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
3Cited by4 opinions
- Jackson Bridge & Iron Co. v. Lancashire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
- People Ex Rel. Youngs v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933
- Hart v. DoyleMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
- O'Neil v. NewmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1903