Legal Opinion

People Ex Rel. Youngs v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1933No. Docket No. 99, Calendar No. 37,154PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButzel, J.

W. E. Wood Company entered into a contract with the city of Flint, Michigan, for the construction of a sewage treatment plant in accordance with plans and specifications furnished by Hoad, Decker, Shoecraft & Drury, engineers, and executed a bond to the city as obligee, and with defendant United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company of Baltimore, a Maryland corporation, as surety, in the sum of $479,000. One of the conditions of the bond was as follows:

“Now, therefore, the condition of this obligation is such, that if the above-named principal, legal representatives, or successors shall pay or…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Avery v. Board of SupervisorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Alberts v. Village of VernonMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  3. People ex rel. Winkle Terra-Cotta Co. v. CotteralMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  4. People ex rel. Buhl Sons Co. v. FinnMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Caswell v. StearnsMichigan Supreme Court · 1932

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Holt & Bugbee Co. v. City of MelroseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  2. Club Holding Co. v. Flint Citizens Loan & Investment Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1935
  3. General Insurance Company of America, a Washington Corpoation v. Lamar Corporation, a Michigan Corporation, Also Known as Lamar Pipe CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1973
  4. Saginaw Pattern Makers' Ass'n v. Saginaw Pattern & Manufacturing Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API