Legal Opinion

O'Neil v. Newman

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 1903No. Docket No. 32PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to Charlevoix; Mayne, J. Case by Thomas O’Neil against Austin C. Newman for killing plaintiff’s dog. Prom a judgment for plaintiff* defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

This suit was commenced in justice’s court. Plaintiff sued and obtained judgment for the value of a dog killed by defendant. It was appealed to the circuit court by defendant, where a jury gave the plaintiff a verdict of $12. The defendant has brought the case here by writ of error.

Many of the assignments of error are- of as general a character as the following: ‘ ‘ The court erred in admitting improper evidence to go to the jury on the part of the plaintiff. ” These assignments of error do not comply with the rules, and will not further be referred to. See Cir. Ct. Rule 47; Sup. Ct. Rule 11;…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Alberts v. Village of VernonMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Jackson Bridge & Iron Co. v. Lancashire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Tupper v. KilduffMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Hecock v. Van DusenMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Wheeler & Wilson Manufacturing Co. v. WalkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1879

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Allegrezza v. ScalcucciMichigan Supreme Court · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API